Paper dossier

Sensory Profiling of High-End Loudspeakers Using Rapid Methods-Part 3: Check-All-That-Apply with Naïve Assessors

Detail viewSimilarity handoff

Review source metadata, abstract, authors, topics, and local similarity context before moving into explanation and ranking views.

Paper year

2018

Citations

2

Authors

3

Topic labels

3

Source readout

Source and corpus status

Venue

Journal of the Audio Engineering Society

Source slug

jaes

Corpus placement

Core corpus

Similarity rows

6

Ranking readout

Where this paper lands in the current run

Ranking details could not be loaded (API 503).

Abstract

This paper is the third in a series of papers investigating the use of rapid methods for sensory profiling of high-end loudspeakers [1, 2]. In this study check-all-that-apply (CATA) was introduced as a method for perceptual audio evaluation. A preliminary test was conducted with naïve assessors to reduce a list of attributes to a suitable number for a CATA question. A listening test was then conducted with naïve assessors using the CATA method, and two methods for characterizing the loudspeakers were explored using Correspondence Analysis (CA) and Hierarchical Cluster Analysis (HCA). The CATA method was able to produce discriminative and descriptive characterizations of the loudspeakers. Further steps to refine the method for the purpose of perceptual audio evaluation with naïve assessors are discussed.

Authors

  • Lucy Hicks
  • Samuel Moulin
  • Søren Bech

Neighborhood labels

Topics

3 labels

Topic labels are imported metadata and can be noisy; use them as coarse navigation hints, not authoritative classifications.

Speech and Audio ProcessingBlind Source Separation TechniquesAcoustic Wave Phenomena Research

Neighbor surface

Similar papers

6 total neighborsEmbedding v1-title-abstract-1536-cleantext-r3

Similar papers use a separately configured neighbor embedding; it may differ from the embedding version used by the current ranked run.

Next handoff

Best next moves from here

01

Check recommendation families

Use Recommended to see whether this paper behaves like an emerging or undercited signal in the current ranked feed, or how it appears on the bridge preview / diagnostics view.

02

Inspect nearby topics

Use Trends to understand whether its attached labels are heating up or cooling down inside the curated corpus.

03

Cross-check evaluation baselines

Use Evaluation to compare the dossier readout against citation and recency baselines for the same resolved family run.