Paper year
2025
Paper dossier
Influence of rhythm features on beat/movement synchronization using a low-cost vision system
Detail viewSimilarity handoff
Review source metadata, abstract, authors, topics, and local similarity context before moving into explanation and ranking views.
Citations
1
Authors
0
Topic labels
0
Source readout
Source and corpus status
Venue
Unknown venue
Source slug
unknown
Corpus placement
Controlled edge slice
Similarity rows
Not available yet
Ranking readout
Where this paper lands in the current run
Ranking details could not be loaded (API 503).
Abstract
This study examines how musical expertise, tempo, and beat division influence synchronization accuracy and regularity in two movement tasks: finger tapping (discrete movements) and arm swing (continuous movements). Using a markerless motion capture system, we analyzed synchronization metrics across different rhythmic conditions. Motion data were extracted via AI-based pose estimation, and synchronization was computed by aligning movement peaks with beat times detected from audio stimuli. Results show that musicians exhibit higher synchronization accuracy and consistency than non-musicians, particularly in finger tapping tasks. Furthermore, simpler beat structures (binary rhythms) and moderate tempos facilitate better synchronization, whereas increased rhythmic complexity and tempo variability reduce performance. Interestingly, finger tapping leads to more precise synchronization than arm swing, suggesting that movement type significantly impacts rhythmic alignment. These findings support applications in therapy, training, and interactive systems, and demonstrate the value of AI-based motion tracking for scalable rhythm analysis.
Authors
No authors available.
Neighborhood labels
Topics
0 labels
Topic labels are imported metadata and can be noisy; use them as coarse navigation hints, not authoritative classifications.
Neighbor surface
Similar papers
Similar papers use a separately configured neighbor embedding; it may differ from the embedding version used by the current ranked run.
No embedding-backed neighbors available for this paper/version yet.
Next handoff
Best next moves from here
01
Check recommendation families
Use Recommended to see whether this paper behaves like an emerging or undercited signal in the current ranked feed, or how it appears on the bridge preview / diagnostics view.
02
Inspect nearby topics
Use Trends to understand whether its attached labels are heating up or cooling down inside the curated corpus.
03
Cross-check evaluation baselines
Use Evaluation to compare the dossier readout against citation and recency baselines for the same resolved family run.