Paper dossier

Numerical Noise in Fixed-Pole Parallel and Kautz Filters

Detail viewSimilarity handoff

Review source metadata, abstract, authors, topics, and local similarity context before moving into explanation and ranking views.

Paper year

2025

Citations

1

Authors

2

Topic labels

1

Source readout

Source and corpus status

Venue

Journal of the Audio Engineering Society

Source slug

jaes

Corpus placement

Core corpus

Similarity rows

Not available yet

Ranking readout

Where this paper lands in the current run

Ranking details could not be loaded (API 503).

Abstract

In audio filtering, Kautz and fixed-pole parallel filters are commonly used, as they have the ability to approximate the frequency resolution of hearing. However, infinite impulse response filters are susceptible to numerical noise, as quantization happens in their feedback loop. This is especially severe in systems where only fixed-point arithmetic is available. In order to limit the noise to an acceptable level, several low-noise second-order structures have been developed. In this paper, the authors compare the numerical noise properties of Kautz and fixed-pole parallel filters implemented in fixed-point arithmetic. The authors present the results for two different scaling methods and show that the common Kautz realization has unacceptable noise levels. Instead, they suggest the use of better performing parallel filters for general (nonadaptive) infinite impulse response filtering and a rearranged all-pass-based Kautz structure for adaptive filtering.

Authors

  • Kristóf Horváth
  • Balázs Bank

Neighborhood labels

Topics

1 labels

Topic labels are imported metadata and can be noisy; use them as coarse navigation hints, not authoritative classifications.

Digital Filter Design and Implementation

Neighbor surface

Similar papers

Similar papers use a separately configured neighbor embedding; it may differ from the embedding version used by the current ranked run.

No embedding-backed neighbors available for this paper/version yet.

Next handoff

Best next moves from here

01

Check recommendation families

Use Recommended to see whether this paper behaves like an emerging or undercited signal in the current ranked feed, or how it appears on the bridge preview / diagnostics view.

02

Inspect nearby topics

Use Trends to understand whether its attached labels are heating up or cooling down inside the curated corpus.

03

Cross-check evaluation baselines

Use Evaluation to compare the dossier readout against citation and recency baselines for the same resolved family run.