Paper year
2025
Detect emerging, bridge-candidate, and undercited papers inside a curated audio-ML corpus, then expose the signals behind every recommendation.
Paper dossier
Review source metadata, abstract, authors, topics, and local similarity context before moving into explanation and ranking views.
Paper year
2025
Citations
6
Authors
2
Topic labels
1
Source readout
Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
jaes
Core corpus
Not available yet
Ranking readout
Ranking details could not be loaded (API 503).
The evaluation of audio quality is important in the development of immersive audio algorithms and reproduction systems, and binaural models are often used for this as a quick alternative to listening tests. Coloration (i.e., perceived loudness differences integrated across ears and frequency) is one key quality aspect; however, the majority of models used to predict coloration are often oversimplified or are missing a dedicated binaural stage to consider the relative contribution of the left and right ear signals. A binaural coloration model is presented that builds upon previous work and tests three different approaches for its binaural stage. The proposed model is evaluated in comparison with nine models that are frequently used to predict coloration by using data from five listening tests totaling 252 stimuli with various audio contents and source positions. The proposed model performed best with 85% of explained variance, followed by predictions based on ISO 532-1 loudness, yielding 78% explained variance. The commonly used log-spectral distance performed worst, with only 44% explained variance. The three tested binaural stages had little influence on the performance of the proposed model. The model is made freely available to download.
Neighborhood labels
Topic labels are imported metadata and can be noisy; use them as coarse navigation hints, not authoritative classifications.
Color Science and Applications
Neighbor surface
Similar papers use a separately configured neighbor embedding; it may differ from the embedding version used by the current ranked run.
No embedding-backed neighbors available for this paper/version yet.
Next handoff
01
Use Recommended to see whether this paper behaves like an emerging or undercited signal in the current ranked feed, or how it appears on the bridge preview / diagnostics view.
02
Use Trends to understand whether its attached labels are heating up or cooling down inside the curated corpus.
03
Use Evaluation to compare the dossier readout against citation and recency baselines for the same resolved family run.