Paper dossier

Toward an Improved Auditory Model for Predicting Binaural Coloration

Detail viewSimilarity handoff

Review source metadata, abstract, authors, topics, and local similarity context before moving into explanation and ranking views.

Paper year

2025

Citations

6

Authors

2

Topic labels

1

Source readout

Source and corpus status

Venue

Journal of the Audio Engineering Society

Source slug

jaes

Corpus placement

Core corpus

Similarity rows

Not available yet

Ranking readout

Where this paper lands in the current run

Ranking details could not be loaded (API 503).

Abstract

The evaluation of audio quality is important in the development of immersive audio algorithms and reproduction systems, and binaural models are often used for this as a quick alternative to listening tests. Coloration (i.e., perceived loudness differences integrated across ears and frequency) is one key quality aspect; however, the majority of models used to predict coloration are often oversimplified or are missing a dedicated binaural stage to consider the relative contribution of the left and right ear signals. A binaural coloration model is presented that builds upon previous work and tests three different approaches for its binaural stage. The proposed model is evaluated in comparison with nine models that are frequently used to predict coloration by using data from five listening tests totaling 252 stimuli with various audio contents and source positions. The proposed model performed best with 85% of explained variance, followed by predictions based on ISO 532-1 loudness, yielding 78% explained variance. The commonly used log-spectral distance performed worst, with only 44% explained variance. The three tested binaural stages had little influence on the performance of the proposed model. The model is made freely available to download.

Authors

  • Thomas McKenzie
  • Fabian Brinkmann

Neighborhood labels

Topics

1 labels

Topic labels are imported metadata and can be noisy; use them as coarse navigation hints, not authoritative classifications.

Color Science and Applications

Neighbor surface

Similar papers

Similar papers use a separately configured neighbor embedding; it may differ from the embedding version used by the current ranked run.

No embedding-backed neighbors available for this paper/version yet.

Next handoff

Best next moves from here

01

Check recommendation families

Use Recommended to see whether this paper behaves like an emerging or undercited signal in the current ranked feed, or how it appears on the bridge preview / diagnostics view.

02

Inspect nearby topics

Use Trends to understand whether its attached labels are heating up or cooling down inside the curated corpus.

03

Cross-check evaluation baselines

Use Evaluation to compare the dossier readout against citation and recency baselines for the same resolved family run.