Paper dossier

Analysis of Various 3D Acquisition Techniques and Mesh Differences for Head-related Transfer Functions Calculation

Detail viewSimilarity handoff

Review source metadata, abstract, authors, topics, and local similarity context before moving into explanation and ranking views.

Paper year

2025

Citations

1

Authors

2

Topic labels

2

Source readout

Source and corpus status

Venue

Journal of the Audio Engineering Society

Source slug

jaes

Corpus placement

Core corpus

Similarity rows

Not available yet

Ranking readout

Where this paper lands in the current run

Ranking details could not be loaded (API 503).

Abstract

The head mesh is a fundamental component in simulating head-related transfer functions (HRTFs). The techniques utilized for acquiring and preprocessing 3D meshes prior to calculation directly influence HRTF results. This study aims to compare the meshes obtained through different methods and analyze the impact of mesh differences on HRTFs. Three mesh capture methods based on different technical principles were employed to obtain the meshes of the human head: magnetic resonance imaging, optical scanner, and LightCage. A comparative analysis revealed that the lateral pinna parameters of the magnetic resonance imaging mesh tend to be larger than those from other methods owing to the lack of ear shape preservation, leading to significant variations in HRTF. The impact of differences in the canal and hair areas of the meshes on HRTFs was also evaluated, revealing that the canal had minimal influence on directional transfer functions of HRTFs. Moreover, bulging caused by hair did not affect localization performance. Based on these results, the study analyzed the advantages and limitations of various methods and their corresponding principles. This research serves as a reference for selecting head mesh acquisition methods and mesh preprocessing for HRTF simulations.

Authors

  • Changqing Sun
  • Kan Okubo

Neighborhood labels

Topics

2 labels

Topic labels are imported metadata and can be noisy; use them as coarse navigation hints, not authoritative classifications.

Engineering Applied ResearchSimulation and Modeling Applications

Neighbor surface

Similar papers

Similar papers use a separately configured neighbor embedding; it may differ from the embedding version used by the current ranked run.

No embedding-backed neighbors available for this paper/version yet.

Next handoff

Best next moves from here

01

Check recommendation families

Use Recommended to see whether this paper behaves like an emerging or undercited signal in the current ranked feed, or how it appears on the bridge preview / diagnostics view.

02

Inspect nearby topics

Use Trends to understand whether its attached labels are heating up or cooling down inside the curated corpus.

03

Cross-check evaluation baselines

Use Evaluation to compare the dossier readout against citation and recency baselines for the same resolved family run.