Paper year
2025
Detect emerging, bridge-candidate, and undercited papers inside a curated audio-ML corpus, then expose the signals behind every recommendation.
Paper dossier
Review source metadata, abstract, authors, topics, and local similarity context before moving into explanation and ranking views.
Paper year
2025
Citations
1
Authors
2
Topic labels
2
Source readout
Journal of the Audio Engineering Society
jaes
Core corpus
Not available yet
Ranking readout
Ranking details could not be loaded (API 503).
The head mesh is a fundamental component in simulating head-related transfer functions (HRTFs). The techniques utilized for acquiring and preprocessing 3D meshes prior to calculation directly influence HRTF results. This study aims to compare the meshes obtained through different methods and analyze the impact of mesh differences on HRTFs. Three mesh capture methods based on different technical principles were employed to obtain the meshes of the human head: magnetic resonance imaging, optical scanner, and LightCage. A comparative analysis revealed that the lateral pinna parameters of the magnetic resonance imaging mesh tend to be larger than those from other methods owing to the lack of ear shape preservation, leading to significant variations in HRTF. The impact of differences in the canal and hair areas of the meshes on HRTFs was also evaluated, revealing that the canal had minimal influence on directional transfer functions of HRTFs. Moreover, bulging caused by hair did not affect localization performance. Based on these results, the study analyzed the advantages and limitations of various methods and their corresponding principles. This research serves as a reference for selecting head mesh acquisition methods and mesh preprocessing for HRTF simulations.
Neighborhood labels
Topic labels are imported metadata and can be noisy; use them as coarse navigation hints, not authoritative classifications.
Engineering Applied ResearchSimulation and Modeling Applications
Neighbor surface
Similar papers use a separately configured neighbor embedding; it may differ from the embedding version used by the current ranked run.
No embedding-backed neighbors available for this paper/version yet.
Next handoff
01
Use Recommended to see whether this paper behaves like an emerging or undercited signal in the current ranked feed, or how it appears on the bridge preview / diagnostics view.
02
Use Trends to understand whether its attached labels are heating up or cooling down inside the curated corpus.
03
Use Evaluation to compare the dossier readout against citation and recency baselines for the same resolved family run.