Paper dossier

Designing Neural Synthesizers for Low-Latency Interaction

Detail viewSimilarity handoff

Review source metadata, abstract, authors, topics, and local similarity context before moving into explanation and ranking views.

Paper year

2025

Citations

1

Authors

5

Topic labels

1

Source readout

Source and corpus status

Venue

Journal of the Audio Engineering Society

Source slug

jaes

Corpus placement

Core corpus

Similarity rows

Not available yet

Ranking readout

Where this paper lands in the current run

Ranking details could not be loaded (API 503).

Abstract

Neural audio synthesis (NAS) models offer interactive musical control over high-quality, expressive audio generators. While these models can operate in real time, they often suffer from high latency, making them unsuitable for intimate musical interaction. The impact of architectural choices in deep learning models on audio latency remains largely unexplored in the NAS literature. In this work, the authors investigate the sources of latency and jitter typically found in interactive NAS models. They then apply this analysis to the task of timbre transfer using the RAVE model (Realtime Audio Variational autoEncoder), a convolutional variational autoencoder for audio waveforms introduced by Caillon and Esling in 2021. Finally, an iterative design approach for optimizing latency is presented. This culminates with a model the authors call BRAVE (Bravely Realtime Audio Variational autoEncoder), which is low-latency and exhibits better pitch and loudness replication while showing timbre modification capabilities similar to RAVE. It is implemented in a specialized inference framework for low-latency, real-time inference, and a proof-of-concept audio plugin compatible with audio signals from musical instruments is presented. The authors expect the challenges and guidelines described in this document to support NAS researchers in designing models for low-latency inference from the ground up, enriching the landscape of possibilities for musicians.

Authors

  • Franco Caspe
  • Jordie Shier
  • M. Sandler
  • Charalampos Saitis
  • Andrew McPherson

Neighborhood labels

Topics

1 labels

Topic labels are imported metadata and can be noisy; use them as coarse navigation hints, not authoritative classifications.

Neural Networks and Applications

Neighbor surface

Similar papers

Similar papers use a separately configured neighbor embedding; it may differ from the embedding version used by the current ranked run.

No embedding-backed neighbors available for this paper/version yet.

Next handoff

Best next moves from here

01

Check recommendation families

Use Recommended to see whether this paper behaves like an emerging or undercited signal in the current ranked feed, or how it appears on the bridge preview / diagnostics view.

02

Inspect nearby topics

Use Trends to understand whether its attached labels are heating up or cooling down inside the curated corpus.

03

Cross-check evaluation baselines

Use Evaluation to compare the dossier readout against citation and recency baselines for the same resolved family run.