Paper year
2025
Paper dossier
Towards an 'Everything Corpus': A Framework and Guidelines for the Curation of More Comprehensive Multimodal Music Data
Detail viewSimilarity handoff
Review source metadata, abstract, authors, topics, and local similarity context before moving into explanation and ranking views.
Citations
2
Authors
3
Topic labels
3
Source readout
Source and corpus status
Venue
Transactions of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval
Source slug
tismir
Corpus placement
Core corpus
Similarity rows
6
Ranking readout
Where this paper lands in the current run
Run shadow-generalization-product-candidate-ranking-v1Top 50 surfaced
This block uses the same resolved ranking run as Recommended. Ranks here are materialized paper_scores ranks; live Emerging may be reordered by the bounded ML scorer. Family rank is global within each family, but rank is only shown when this paper lands inside the surfaced top 50.
Families present
3
Top 50
3
Run label
shadow-generalization-product-candidate-ranking-v1
Snapshot
source-snapshot-shadow-generalization-v1-20260521
Scope: family global | run rank-83787b91ef
Emerging
In top 50 at rank 10
Emerging: embedding slice fit vs included-corpus centroid (title+abstract), plus citation velocity and topic growth; not universal relevance. Bridge signal not used here.
Signals: semantic=0.8514, citation_velocity=0.1200, topic_growth=0.9050, diversity_penalty=0.0000
Why this surfaced | 3 used | 1 penalty | 1 not computed
Embedding slice fit (corpus centroid)used
Embedding slice fit (corpus centroid): high; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.1703)
Recent attentionused
Recent attention: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0600)
Topic momentumused
Topic momentum: high; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.2715)
Cross-cluster signalnot computed
Cross-cluster signal: not computed for this run
Similarity penaltypenalty
Similarity penalty: reduces score when non-zero (contribution to score: 0.0000)
Bridge
In top 50 at rank 5
Multi-topic paper in active topics; no cluster_version on this run so bridge_score was not computed.
Signals: citation_velocity=0.1200, topic_growth=0.9050, diversity_penalty=0.0000
Why this surfaced | 2 used | 1 penalty | 2 not computed
Semantic matchnot computed
Semantic match: not computed for this run
Recent attentionused
Recent attention: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0420)
Topic momentumused
Topic momentum: high; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.5882)
Cross-cluster signalnot computed
Cross-cluster signal: not computed for this run
Topic breadth penaltypenalty
Topic breadth penalty: reduces score when non-zero (contribution to score: 0.0000)
Under-cited
In top 50 at rank 29
Low-cite candidate pool (see docs/candidate-pool-low-cite.md v0): core corpus, recency floor, citation ceiling, title+abstract gate; popularity penalty among pool members only. Semantic and bridge not yet modeled.
Signals: citation_velocity=0.1200, topic_growth=0.9050, diversity_penalty=0.4421
Why this surfaced | 2 used | 1 penalty | 2 not computed
Semantic matchnot computed
Semantic match: not computed for this run
Recent attentionused
Recent attention: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0360)
Topic momentumused
Topic momentum: high; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.6335)
Cross-cluster signalnot computed
Cross-cluster signal: not computed for this run
Pool popularity penaltypenalty
Pool popularity penalty: reduces score when non-zero (contribution to score: -0.1105)
Abstract
Music information retrieval (MIR) is increasingly concerned with properly managing the complexity of musical data and the curation of high-quality multimodal datasets for use in a variety of computational tasks. This article presents (1) a conceptual framework for how practitioners interested in MIR-from musicians to scientists-can understand the multitude of modalities that constitute musical data and (2) a set of proposed guidelines for MIR researchers to consider when setting out to curate comprehensive, well-targeted, durable, and ethically sourced multimodal datasets. For (1), we identify 12 different themes of musical data divided into three, sequential phases further subdivided into five, narrow focus areas: (i) 'before' the music (leading to), (ii) the 'actual' music (itself and around it), and (iii) 'after' the music (uses of and responses to). For (2), we identify 17 specific quantitative, qualitative, and ethical criteria, informed by this conceptual framework and practices observed in existing multimodal datasets, for the eventual construction of an 'Everything Corpus' for MIR research.
Authors
Neighborhood labels
Topics
3 labels
Topic labels are imported metadata and can be noisy; use them as coarse navigation hints, not authoritative classifications.
Music and Audio ProcessingDiverse Musicological StudiesNatural Language Processing Techniques
Neighbor surface
Similar papers
6 total neighborsEmbedding v1-title-abstract-1536-cleantext-r3
Similar papers use a separately configured neighbor embedding; it may differ from the embedding version used by the current ranked run.
- Music and Audio ProcessingDiverse Musicological StudiesMusic Technology and Sound Studies
- Music and Audio ProcessingMusic Technology and Sound StudiesDiverse Musicological Studies
- Music and Audio ProcessingDiverse Musicological StudiesMusic Technology and Sound Studies
- Music and Audio ProcessingDiverse Musicological StudiesMusic Technology and Sound Studies
- Anthropology: Ethics, History, Culture
- Music and Audio ProcessingMusic Technology and Sound StudiesDiverse Musicological Studies
Next handoff
Best next moves from here
01
Check recommendation families
Use Recommended to see whether this paper behaves like an emerging or undercited signal in the current ranked feed, or how it appears on the bridge preview / diagnostics view.
02
Inspect nearby topics
Use Trends to understand whether its attached labels are heating up or cooling down inside the curated corpus.
03
Cross-check evaluation baselines
Use Evaluation to compare the dossier readout against citation and recency baselines for the same resolved family run.