Paper dossier

MGPHot: A Dataset of Musicological Annotations for Popular Music (1958-2022)

Detail viewSimilarity handoff

Review source metadata, abstract, authors, topics, and local similarity context before moving into explanation and ranking views.

Paper year

2025

Citations

0

Authors

4

Topic labels

3

Source readout

Source and corpus status

Venue

Transactions of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval

Source slug

tismir

Corpus placement

Core corpus

Similarity rows

6

Ranking readout

Where this paper lands in the current run

Run shadow-generalization-product-candidate-ranking-v1Top 50 surfaced

This block uses the same resolved ranking run as Recommended. Ranks here are materialized paper_scores ranks; live Emerging may be reordered by the bounded ML scorer. Family rank is global within each family, but rank is only shown when this paper lands inside the surfaced top 50.

Families present

3

Top 50

2

Run label

shadow-generalization-product-candidate-ranking-v1

Snapshot

source-snapshot-shadow-generalization-v1-20260521

Scope: family global | run rank-83787b91ef

Emerging

Present in run, outside top 50

0.407

Emerging: embedding slice fit vs included-corpus centroid (title+abstract), plus citation velocity and topic growth; not universal relevance. Bridge signal not used here.

Signals: semantic=0.8121, citation_velocity=0.0000, topic_growth=0.8160, diversity_penalty=0.0000

Why this surfaced | 3 used | 1 penalty | 1 not computed
Embedding slice fit (corpus centroid)used

Embedding slice fit (corpus centroid): high; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.1624)

Recent attentionused

Recent attention: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0000)

Topic momentumused

Topic momentum: high; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.2448)

Cross-cluster signalnot computed

Cross-cluster signal: not computed for this run

Similarity penaltypenalty

Similarity penalty: reduces score when non-zero (contribution to score: 0.0000)

Bridge

In top 50 at rank 40

0.530

Multi-topic paper in active topics; no cluster_version on this run so bridge_score was not computed.

Signals: citation_velocity=0.0000, topic_growth=0.8160, diversity_penalty=0.0000

Why this surfaced | 2 used | 1 penalty | 2 not computed
Semantic matchnot computed

Semantic match: not computed for this run

Recent attentionused

Recent attention: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0000)

Topic momentumused

Topic momentum: high; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.5304)

Cross-cluster signalnot computed

Cross-cluster signal: not computed for this run

Topic breadth penaltypenalty

Topic breadth penalty: reduces score when non-zero (contribution to score: 0.0000)

Under-cited

In top 50 at rank 26

0.571

Low-cite candidate pool (see docs/candidate-pool-low-cite.md v0): core corpus, recency floor, citation ceiling, title+abstract gate; popularity penalty among pool members only. Semantic and bridge not yet modeled.

Signals: citation_velocity=0.0000, topic_growth=0.8160, diversity_penalty=0.0000

Why this surfaced | 2 used | 1 penalty | 2 not computed
Semantic matchnot computed

Semantic match: not computed for this run

Recent attentionused

Recent attention: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0000)

Topic momentumused

Topic momentum: high; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.5712)

Cross-cluster signalnot computed

Cross-cluster signal: not computed for this run

Pool popularity penaltypenalty

Pool popularity penalty: reduces score when non-zero (contribution to score: 0.0000)

Abstract

The Music Genome Project® is an extensive music annotation effort spanning two decades, during which a team of musicologists has been annotating a dataset of millions of songs with hundreds of musicological attributes. A derivative of this effort is presented in this paper. We are releasing MGPHot, a dataset of more than 21,000 songs that have appeared at least once in the Billboard Hot 100 charts from 1958 until 2022, annotated with 58 musical attributes that are grouped into seven different categories: rhythm, compositional focus, harmony, instrumentation, sonority, vocals, and lyrics. Given the unprecedented quality and breadth of annotation, as well as the size of the released corpus, the MGPHot dataset opens up a myriad of possibilities for musicology and music information retrieval, such as auto‑tagging, chart prediction, and music recommendation. To illustrate the breadth and depth of the dataset, we conduct a study on the evolution of popular music over the past 65 years, focusing on when and how changes occurred. While previous research has approached this topic through audio processing or historical methods, comprehensive musicological analyses at scale have been lacking, which this new dataset facilitates. In our study, we identify distinct eras and pivotal moments, reaffirming and broadening previous research on stylistic revolutions, and investigating the musical attributes that drive these changes. By analyzing the 58 musical attributes, we identify three major revolutions (1964, 1983, and 2016) and two minor ones (1991 and 2007), each propelled by specific musical attributes.

Authors

  • Sergio Oramas
  • Fabien Gouyon
  • Camilo Landau
  • Andreas F. Ehmann

Neighborhood labels

Topics

3 labels

Topic labels are imported metadata and can be noisy; use them as coarse navigation hints, not authoritative classifications.

Music and Audio ProcessingMusic Technology and Sound StudiesNeuroscience and Music Perception

Neighbor surface

Similar papers

6 total neighborsEmbedding v1-title-abstract-1536-cleantext-r3

Similar papers use a separately configured neighbor embedding; it may differ from the embedding version used by the current ranked run.

Next handoff

Best next moves from here

01

Check recommendation families

Use Recommended to see whether this paper behaves like an emerging or undercited signal in the current ranked feed, or how it appears on the bridge preview / diagnostics view.

02

Inspect nearby topics

Use Trends to understand whether its attached labels are heating up or cooling down inside the curated corpus.

03

Cross-check evaluation baselines

Use Evaluation to compare the dossier readout against citation and recency baselines for the same resolved family run.