Paper year
2025
Paper dossier
FakeMusicCaps: A Dataset for Detection and Attribution of Synthetic Music Generated via Text-to-Music Models
Detail viewSimilarity handoff
Review source metadata, abstract, authors, topics, and local similarity context before moving into explanation and ranking views.
Citations
10
Authors
0
Topic labels
0
Source readout
Source and corpus status
Venue
Unknown venue
Source slug
unknown
Corpus placement
Controlled edge slice
Similarity rows
Not available yet
Ranking readout
Where this paper lands in the current run
Run shadow-generalization-product-candidate-ranking-v1Top 50 surfaced
This block uses the same resolved ranking run as Recommended. Ranks here are materialized paper_scores ranks; live Emerging may be reordered by the bounded ML scorer. Family rank is global within each family, but rank is only shown when this paper lands inside the surfaced top 50.
Families present
2
Top 50
1
Run label
shadow-generalization-product-candidate-ranking-v1
Snapshot
source-snapshot-shadow-generalization-v1-20260521
Scope: family global | run rank-83787b91ef
Emerging
In top 50 at rank 21
Emerging: embedding slice fit vs included-corpus centroid (title+abstract), plus citation velocity and topic growth; not universal relevance. Bridge signal not used here.
Signals: semantic=0.8281, citation_velocity=0.6000, topic_growth=0.0000, diversity_penalty=0.0000
Why this surfaced | 3 used | 1 penalty | 1 not computed
Embedding slice fit (corpus centroid)used
Embedding slice fit (corpus centroid): high; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.1656)
Recent attentionused
Recent attention: medium; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.3000)
Topic momentumused
Topic momentum: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0000)
Cross-cluster signalnot computed
Cross-cluster signal: not computed for this run
Similarity penaltypenalty
Similarity penalty: reduces score when non-zero (contribution to score: 0.0000)
Bridge
Present in run, outside top 50
Multi-topic paper in active topics; no cluster_version on this run so bridge_score was not computed.
Signals: citation_velocity=0.6000, topic_growth=0.0000, diversity_penalty=1.0000
Why this surfaced | 2 used | 1 penalty | 2 not computed
Semantic matchnot computed
Semantic match: not computed for this run
Recent attentionused
Recent attention: medium; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.2100)
Topic momentumused
Topic momentum: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0000)
Cross-cluster signalnot computed
Cross-cluster signal: not computed for this run
Topic breadth penaltypenalty
Topic breadth penalty: reduces score when non-zero (contribution to score: -0.2000)
Under-cited
No materialized row for this family in the resolved run
This paper did not surface into the current materialized family row set.
Abstract
Text-to-music (TTM) models have recently revolutionized the automatic music generation research field, specifically by being able to generate music that sounds more plausible than all previous state-of-the-art models and by lowering the technical proficiency needed to use them. For these reasons, they have readily started to be adopted for commercial uses and music production practices. This widespread diffusion of TTMs poses several concerns regarding copyright violation and rightful attribution, posing the need of serious consideration of them by the audio forensics community. In this paper, we tackle the problem of detection and attribution of TTM-generated data. We propose a dataset, FakeMusicCaps, that contains several versions of the music-caption pairs dataset MusicCaps regenerated via several state-of-the-art TTM techniques. We evaluate the proposed dataset by performing initial experiments regarding the detection and attribution of TTM-generated audio considering both closed-set and open-set classification.
Authors
No authors available.
Neighborhood labels
Topics
0 labels
Topic labels are imported metadata and can be noisy; use them as coarse navigation hints, not authoritative classifications.
Neighbor surface
Similar papers
Similar papers use a separately configured neighbor embedding; it may differ from the embedding version used by the current ranked run.
No embedding-backed neighbors available for this paper/version yet.
Next handoff
Best next moves from here
01
Check recommendation families
Use Recommended to see whether this paper behaves like an emerging or undercited signal in the current ranked feed, or how it appears on the bridge preview / diagnostics view.
02
Inspect nearby topics
Use Trends to understand whether its attached labels are heating up or cooling down inside the curated corpus.
03
Cross-check evaluation baselines
Use Evaluation to compare the dossier readout against citation and recency baselines for the same resolved family run.