Paper year
2025
Paper dossier
Deep learning model using squeezenet and promoted ideal gas molecular motion for music genre classification from audio spectrograms
Detail viewSimilarity handoff
Review source metadata, abstract, authors, topics, and local similarity context before moving into explanation and ranking views.
Citations
1
Authors
0
Topic labels
0
Source readout
Source and corpus status
Venue
Unknown venue
Source slug
unknown
Corpus placement
Controlled edge slice
Similarity rows
Not available yet
Ranking readout
Where this paper lands in the current run
Ranking details could not be loaded (API 503).
Abstract
It may be argued that music genre classification (MGC) is one of the most important tasks in music information retrieval; however, it still suffers from being a high-dimensional, highly variable, and noisy audio signal. Most traditional deep learning models require large computational setups and do not fare well in the instances of overfitting and local optima. The paper proposes a new hybridization: SqueezeNet optimized through PIGMM (Promoted Ideal Gas Molecular Motion) for enhanced MGC performance. PIGMM, which is a metaheuristic algorithm with roots in molecular dynamics and is improved by chaos theory and opposition-based learning, was used to optimize the parameters of SqueezeNet for improved convergence and generalization. The model that works on audio spectrograms demonstrates 96% accuracy in feature extraction. Under ten-fold cross-validation on the GTZAN and Extended Ballroom datasets, the method achieves classification accuracies of 91.1% and 93.4%, respectively, both of which outperform state-of-the-art models. The results show the highest precision values of 93.5% and 95.8% as well as recall values of 96.5% and 97.7%, thus confirming the strength and effectiveness of this model. The work presents a lightweight and noise-resilient solution for scalable music classification.
Authors
No authors available.
Neighborhood labels
Topics
0 labels
Topic labels are imported metadata and can be noisy; use them as coarse navigation hints, not authoritative classifications.
Neighbor surface
Similar papers
Similar papers use a separately configured neighbor embedding; it may differ from the embedding version used by the current ranked run.
No embedding-backed neighbors available for this paper/version yet.
Next handoff
Best next moves from here
01
Check recommendation families
Use Recommended to see whether this paper behaves like an emerging or undercited signal in the current ranked feed, or how it appears on the bridge preview / diagnostics view.
02
Inspect nearby topics
Use Trends to understand whether its attached labels are heating up or cooling down inside the curated corpus.
03
Cross-check evaluation baselines
Use Evaluation to compare the dossier readout against citation and recency baselines for the same resolved family run.