Paper dossier

Moises-Light: Resource-efficient Band-split U-Net For Music Source Separation

Detail viewSimilarity handoff

Review source metadata, abstract, authors, topics, and local similarity context before moving into explanation and ranking views.

Paper year

2025

Citations

0

Authors

0

Topic labels

0

Paper ID: W4415097458edge sliceunknown source slug

Source readout

Source and corpus status

Venue

Unknown venue

Source slug

unknown

Corpus placement

Controlled edge slice

Similarity rows

Not available yet

Ranking readout

Where this paper lands in the current run

Ranking details could not be loaded (API 503).

Abstract

In recent years, significant advances have been made in music source separation, with model architectures such as dual-path modeling, band-split modules, or transformer layers achieving comparably good results. However, these models often contain a significant number of parameters, posing challenges to devices with limited computational resources in terms of training and practical application. While some lightweight models have been introduced, they generally perform worse compared to their larger counterparts. In this paper, we take inspiration from these recent advances to improve a lightweight model. We demonstrate that with careful design, a lightweight model can achieve comparable SDRs to models with up to 13 times more parameters. Our proposed model, Moises-Light, achieves competitive results in separating four musical stems on the MUSDB-HQ benchmark dataset. The proposed model also demonstrates competitive scalability when using MoisesDB as additional training data.

Authors

No authors available.

Neighborhood labels

Topics

0 labels

Topic labels are imported metadata and can be noisy; use them as coarse navigation hints, not authoritative classifications.

Neighbor surface

Similar papers

Similar papers use a separately configured neighbor embedding; it may differ from the embedding version used by the current ranked run.

No embedding-backed neighbors available for this paper/version yet.

Next handoff

Best next moves from here

01

Check recommendation families

Use Recommended to see whether this paper behaves like an emerging or undercited signal in the current ranked feed, or how it appears on the bridge preview / diagnostics view.

02

Inspect nearby topics

Use Trends to understand whether its attached labels are heating up or cooling down inside the curated corpus.

03

Cross-check evaluation baselines

Use Evaluation to compare the dossier readout against citation and recency baselines for the same resolved family run.