Paper year
2026
Detect emerging, bridge-candidate, and undercited papers inside a curated audio-ML corpus, then expose the signals behind every recommendation.
Paper dossier
Review source metadata, abstract, authors, topics, and local similarity context before moving into explanation and ranking views.
Paper year
2026
Citations
0
Authors
0
Topic labels
0
Source readout
Unknown venue
jaes
Core corpus
Not available yet
Ranking readout
This block uses the same resolved ranking run as Recommended. Ranks here are materialized paper_scores ranks; live Emerging may be reordered by the bounded ML scorer. Family rank is global within each family, but rank is only shown when this paper lands inside the surfaced top 50.
Families present
3
Top 50
0
Run label
shadow-generalization-product-candidate-ranking-v1
Snapshot
source-snapshot-shadow-generalization-v1-20260521
Scope: family global | run rank-83787b91ef
Emerging
Present in run, outside top 50
Emerging: embedding slice fit vs included-corpus centroid (title+abstract), plus citation velocity and topic growth; not universal relevance. Bridge signal not used here.
Signals: semantic=0.8239, citation_velocity=0.0000, topic_growth=0.0000, diversity_penalty=0.0000
Embedding slice fit (corpus centroid): high; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.1648)
Recent attention: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0000)
Topic momentum: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0000)
Cross-cluster signal: not computed for this run
Similarity penalty: reduces score when non-zero (contribution to score: 0.0000)
Bridge
Present in run, outside top 50
Multi-topic paper in active topics; no cluster_version on this run so bridge_score was not computed.
Signals: citation_velocity=0.0000, topic_growth=0.0000, diversity_penalty=1.0000
Semantic match: not computed for this run
Recent attention: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0000)
Topic momentum: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0000)
Cross-cluster signal: not computed for this run
Topic breadth penalty: reduces score when non-zero (contribution to score: -0.2000)
Under-cited
Present in run, outside top 50
Low-cite candidate pool (see docs/candidate-pool-low-cite.md v0): core corpus, recency floor, citation ceiling, title+abstract gate; popularity penalty among pool members only. Semantic and bridge not yet modeled.
Signals: citation_velocity=0.0000, topic_growth=0.0000, diversity_penalty=0.0000
Semantic match: not computed for this run
Recent attention: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0000)
Topic momentum: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0000)
Cross-cluster signal: not computed for this run
Pool popularity penalty: reduces score when non-zero (contribution to score: 0.0000)
This study shows that contemporary popular music with electronic elements can intentionally exploit multiple or ambiguous pitch perceptions arising from a single harmonic complex tone. The phenomenon is illustrated with examples from the work of electronic artist Vitalic and from widely used electronically mediated tones. Two listening tests were conducted: (1) evaluation of the number of simultaneous pitches perceived in sequences of quasi-harmonic tones, and (2) manual pitch transcription of selected sequences. Relationships between signal characteristics and pitch perception were subsequently analyzed. In the musical sequences under consideration, the synthesized harmonic tones were found to convey a greater number of perceived pitches than the acoustic tones. Multiple ambiguous pitches were associated with features such as prominent upper partials and specific autocorrelation profiles. In contemporary popular music with an electronic component, harmonic tones can convey multiple ambiguous pitches. The set of perceived pitches depends on both the listener and the listening conditions.
No authors available.
Neighborhood labels
Topic labels are imported metadata and can be noisy; use them as coarse navigation hints, not authoritative classifications.
Neighbor surface
Similar papers use a separately configured neighbor embedding; it may differ from the embedding version used by the current ranked run.
No embedding-backed neighbors available for this paper/version yet.
Next handoff
01
Use Recommended to see whether this paper behaves like an emerging or undercited signal in the current ranked feed, or how it appears on the bridge preview / diagnostics view.
02
Use Trends to understand whether its attached labels are heating up or cooling down inside the curated corpus.
03
Use Evaluation to compare the dossier readout against citation and recency baselines for the same resolved family run.