Paper year
2025
Detect emerging, bridge-candidate, and undercited papers inside a curated audio-ML corpus, then expose the signals behind every recommendation.
Paper dossier
Review source metadata, abstract, authors, topics, and local similarity context before moving into explanation and ranking views.
Paper year
2025
Citations
6
Authors
0
Topic labels
0
Source readout
Unknown venue
unknown
Controlled edge slice
Not available yet
Ranking readout
This block uses the same resolved ranking run as Recommended. Ranks here are materialized paper_scores ranks; live Emerging may be reordered by the bounded ML scorer. Family rank is global within each family, but rank is only shown when this paper lands inside the surfaced top 50.
Families present
2
Top 50
0
Run label
shadow-generalization-product-candidate-ranking-v1
Snapshot
source-snapshot-shadow-generalization-v1-20260521
Scope: family global | run rank-83787b91ef
Emerging
Present in run, outside top 50
Emerging: embedding slice fit vs included-corpus centroid (title+abstract), plus citation velocity and topic growth; not universal relevance. Bridge signal not used here.
Signals: semantic=0.7406, citation_velocity=0.3600, topic_growth=0.0000, diversity_penalty=0.0000
Embedding slice fit (corpus centroid): high; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.1481)
Recent attention: medium; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.1800)
Topic momentum: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0000)
Cross-cluster signal: not computed for this run
Similarity penalty: reduces score when non-zero (contribution to score: 0.0000)
Bridge
Present in run, outside top 50
Multi-topic paper in active topics; no cluster_version on this run so bridge_score was not computed.
Signals: citation_velocity=0.3600, topic_growth=0.0000, diversity_penalty=1.0000
Semantic match: not computed for this run
Recent attention: medium; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.1260)
Topic momentum: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0000)
Cross-cluster signal: not computed for this run
Topic breadth penalty: reduces score when non-zero (contribution to score: -0.2000)
Under-cited
No materialized row for this family in the resolved run
This paper did not surface into the current materialized family row set.
The evolution of the traditional power grid into the "smart grid" has resulted in a fundamental shift in energy management which allows the integration of renewable energy sources with modern communication technology. However, this interconnection has increased smart grids' vulnerability to attackers, which might result in privacy breaches, operational interruptions, and massive outages. The SCADA-based smart grid protocols are critical for realtime data collecting and control, but they are vulnerable to attacks like unauthorized access and denial of service (DoS). This research proposes a hybrid deep learning-based Intrusion Detection System (IDS) intended to improve the cybersecurity of smart grids. The suggested model takes advantage of Convolutional Neural Networks' (CNN) feature extraction capabilities as well as Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks' temporal pattern recognition skills. DNP3 and IEC104 intrusion detection datasets are employed to train and test our CNNLSTM model to recognize and classify the potential cyberthreats. Comparing to other deep learning approaches, the results demonstrate considerable improvements in accuracy, precision, recall, and F1- score, with a detection accuracy of 99.70%.
No authors available.
Neighborhood labels
Topic labels are imported metadata and can be noisy; use them as coarse navigation hints, not authoritative classifications.
Neighbor surface
Similar papers use a separately configured neighbor embedding; it may differ from the embedding version used by the current ranked run.
No embedding-backed neighbors available for this paper/version yet.
Next handoff
01
Use Recommended to see whether this paper behaves like an emerging or undercited signal in the current ranked feed, or how it appears on the bridge preview / diagnostics view.
02
Use Trends to understand whether its attached labels are heating up or cooling down inside the curated corpus.
03
Use Evaluation to compare the dossier readout against citation and recency baselines for the same resolved family run.