Paper year
2025
Detect emerging, bridge-candidate, and undercited papers inside a curated audio-ML corpus, then expose the signals behind every recommendation.
Paper dossier
Review source metadata, abstract, authors, topics, and local similarity context before moving into explanation and ranking views.
Paper year
2025
Citations
1
Authors
0
Topic labels
0
Source readout
Unknown venue
unknown
Controlled edge slice
Not available yet
Ranking readout
This block uses the same resolved ranking run as Recommended. Ranks here are materialized paper_scores ranks; live Emerging may be reordered by the bounded ML scorer. Family rank is global within each family, but rank is only shown when this paper lands inside the surfaced top 50.
Families present
2
Top 50
0
Run label
shadow-generalization-product-candidate-ranking-v1
Snapshot
source-snapshot-shadow-generalization-v1-20260521
Scope: family global | run rank-83787b91ef
Emerging
Present in run, outside top 50
Emerging: embedding slice fit vs included-corpus centroid (title+abstract), plus citation velocity and topic growth; not universal relevance. Bridge signal not used here.
Signals: semantic=0.8687, citation_velocity=0.0600, topic_growth=0.0000, diversity_penalty=0.0000
Embedding slice fit (corpus centroid): high; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.1737)
Recent attention: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0300)
Topic momentum: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0000)
Cross-cluster signal: not computed for this run
Similarity penalty: reduces score when non-zero (contribution to score: 0.0000)
Bridge
Present in run, outside top 50
Multi-topic paper in active topics; no cluster_version on this run so bridge_score was not computed.
Signals: citation_velocity=0.0600, topic_growth=0.0000, diversity_penalty=1.0000
Semantic match: not computed for this run
Recent attention: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0210)
Topic momentum: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0000)
Cross-cluster signal: not computed for this run
Topic breadth penalty: reduces score when non-zero (contribution to score: -0.2000)
Under-cited
No materialized row for this family in the resolved run
This paper did not surface into the current materialized family row set.
Dataset augmentation techniques have been widely used to achieve state-of-the-art results in Music Information Retrieval tasks. However, their application in music emotion recognition (MER) remains underexplored. MER methods are particularly relevant to the design of smart musical instruments (SMIs), as emotionally aware SMIs have the potential to enrich musical interaction by providing feedback to musicians or dynamically adjusting their sound properties. In this study, we analyze the effect of 11 augmentation techniques on emotion classification in guitar recordings using a convolutional neural network. Our dataset consists of approximately 400 guitar recordings labeled with four emotions: aggressiveness, relaxation, happiness, and sadness. Results indicate that time shift, time stretch, and pitch shift provide the most significant improvements in classification accuracy. Further analysis combining these techniques under different settings yielded similar performance outcomes. A listening test confirmed that the applied augmentations did not significantly alter the perceived emotional content of the recordings. These findings support the development of emotionally aware SMIs by enhancing MER accuracy through data augmentation, ultimately enabling more expressive and interactive music-making experiences.
No authors available.
Neighborhood labels
Topic labels are imported metadata and can be noisy; use them as coarse navigation hints, not authoritative classifications.
Neighbor surface
Similar papers use a separately configured neighbor embedding; it may differ from the embedding version used by the current ranked run.
No embedding-backed neighbors available for this paper/version yet.
Next handoff
01
Use Recommended to see whether this paper behaves like an emerging or undercited signal in the current ranked feed, or how it appears on the bridge preview / diagnostics view.
02
Use Trends to understand whether its attached labels are heating up or cooling down inside the curated corpus.
03
Use Evaluation to compare the dossier readout against citation and recency baselines for the same resolved family run.