Paper dossier

Multimodal Datasets for Studying Expert Performances of Musical Scores

Detail viewSimilarity handoff

Review source metadata, abstract, authors, topics, and local similarity context before moving into explanation and ranking views.

Paper year

2025

Citations

2

Authors

1

Topic labels

3

Source readout

Source and corpus status

Venue

Transactions of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval

Source slug

tismir

Corpus placement

Core corpus

Similarity rows

Not available yet

Ranking readout

Where this paper lands in the current run

Run shadow-generalization-product-candidate-ranking-v1Top 50 surfaced

This block uses the same resolved ranking run as Recommended. Ranks here are materialized paper_scores ranks; live Emerging may be reordered by the bounded ML scorer. Family rank is global within each family, but rank is only shown when this paper lands inside the surfaced top 50.

Families present

3

Top 50

3

Run label

shadow-generalization-product-candidate-ranking-v1

Snapshot

source-snapshot-shadow-generalization-v1-20260521

Scope: family global | run rank-83787b91ef

Emerging

In top 50 at rank 16

0.481

Emerging: embedding slice fit vs included-corpus centroid (title+abstract), plus citation velocity and topic growth; not universal relevance. Bridge signal not used here.

Signals: semantic=0.8819, citation_velocity=0.1200, topic_growth=0.8160, diversity_penalty=0.0000

Why this surfaced | 3 used | 1 penalty | 1 not computed
Embedding slice fit (corpus centroid)used

Embedding slice fit (corpus centroid): high; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.1764)

Recent attentionused

Recent attention: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0600)

Topic momentumused

Topic momentum: high; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.2448)

Cross-cluster signalnot computed

Cross-cluster signal: not computed for this run

Similarity penaltypenalty

Similarity penalty: reduces score when non-zero (contribution to score: 0.0000)

Bridge

In top 50 at rank 18

0.572

Multi-topic paper in active topics; no cluster_version on this run so bridge_score was not computed.

Signals: citation_velocity=0.1200, topic_growth=0.8160, diversity_penalty=0.0000

Why this surfaced | 2 used | 1 penalty | 2 not computed
Semantic matchnot computed

Semantic match: not computed for this run

Recent attentionused

Recent attention: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0420)

Topic momentumused

Topic momentum: high; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.5304)

Cross-cluster signalnot computed

Cross-cluster signal: not computed for this run

Topic breadth penaltypenalty

Topic breadth penalty: reduces score when non-zero (contribution to score: 0.0000)

Under-cited

In top 50 at rank 48

0.497

Low-cite candidate pool (see docs/candidate-pool-low-cite.md v0): core corpus, recency floor, citation ceiling, title+abstract gate; popularity penalty among pool members only. Semantic and bridge not yet modeled.

Signals: citation_velocity=0.1200, topic_growth=0.8160, diversity_penalty=0.4421

Why this surfaced | 2 used | 1 penalty | 2 not computed
Semantic matchnot computed

Semantic match: not computed for this run

Recent attentionused

Recent attention: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0360)

Topic momentumused

Topic momentum: high; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.5712)

Cross-cluster signalnot computed

Cross-cluster signal: not computed for this run

Pool popularity penaltypenalty

Pool popularity penalty: reduces score when non-zero (contribution to score: -0.1105)

Abstract

In many musical styles, performing a piece of music means to produce an 'interpretation' of a score. This interpretation involves performers manipulating musical parameters such as timing, dynamics, timbre, and pitch to communicate their artistic conception of the piece, often to an audience. Much previous research into musical interpretations has examined aspects of expressive performance strategies. However, these studies have largely focused solely on the sounds produced in the performance, investigating players' manipulation of musical parameters but little of the performance's broader context and impact. Multimodal datasets, which contain multiple diverse data types offering distinct perspectives on the musical performance (e.g. audio, Musical Instrument Digital Interface, video, motion capture, physiological data), can support more holistic cross- and interdisciplinary study of performers' interpretative decision-making and its effects on audiences. We propose a taxonomy of modalities relevant to study of musicians' interpretations of musical scores. These modalities are distinct facets of the performance or its context through which the performance and musical interpretation can be analysed (e.g. 'venue acoustics', 'performer movements', 'performance sound'). We use this taxonomy to systematically review relevant open-access multimodal datasets and the modalities they support. Underrepresented modalities are then highlighted, along with practical suggestions for including data that support these modalities in future datasets. We next examine key challenges of reporting and working with multimodal datasets, emphasising the need for standardisation of data reporting and reliable options for data storage and access. Finally, we summarise the broader interdisciplinary applications of these datasets in artificial intelligence and performance research.

Authors

  • Katelyn Emerson

Neighborhood labels

Topics

3 labels

Topic labels are imported metadata and can be noisy; use them as coarse navigation hints, not authoritative classifications.

Music Technology and Sound StudiesNeuroscience and Music PerceptionMusic and Audio Processing

Neighbor surface

Similar papers

Similar papers use a separately configured neighbor embedding; it may differ from the embedding version used by the current ranked run.

No embedding-backed neighbors available for this paper/version yet.

Next handoff

Best next moves from here

01

Check recommendation families

Use Recommended to see whether this paper behaves like an emerging or undercited signal in the current ranked feed, or how it appears on the bridge preview / diagnostics view.

02

Inspect nearby topics

Use Trends to understand whether its attached labels are heating up or cooling down inside the curated corpus.

03

Cross-check evaluation baselines

Use Evaluation to compare the dossier readout against citation and recency baselines for the same resolved family run.