Paper year
2026
Detect emerging, bridge-candidate, and undercited papers inside a curated audio-ML corpus, then expose the signals behind every recommendation.
Paper dossier
Review source metadata, abstract, authors, topics, and local similarity context before moving into explanation and ranking views.
Paper year
2026
Citations
0
Authors
0
Topic labels
0
Source readout
Unknown venue
unknown
Controlled edge slice
Not available yet
Ranking readout
This block uses the same resolved ranking run as Recommended. Ranks here are materialized paper_scores ranks; live Emerging may be reordered by the bounded ML scorer. Family rank is global within each family, but rank is only shown when this paper lands inside the surfaced top 50.
Families present
2
Top 50
0
Run label
shadow-generalization-product-candidate-ranking-v1
Snapshot
source-snapshot-shadow-generalization-v1-20260521
Scope: family global | run rank-83787b91ef
Emerging
Present in run, outside top 50
Emerging: embedding slice fit vs included-corpus centroid (title+abstract), plus citation velocity and topic growth; not universal relevance. Bridge signal not used here.
Signals: semantic=0.8276, citation_velocity=0.0000, topic_growth=0.0000, diversity_penalty=0.0000
Embedding slice fit (corpus centroid): high; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.1655)
Recent attention: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0000)
Topic momentum: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0000)
Cross-cluster signal: not computed for this run
Similarity penalty: reduces score when non-zero (contribution to score: 0.0000)
Bridge
Present in run, outside top 50
Multi-topic paper in active topics; no cluster_version on this run so bridge_score was not computed.
Signals: citation_velocity=0.0000, topic_growth=0.0000, diversity_penalty=1.0000
Semantic match: not computed for this run
Recent attention: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0000)
Topic momentum: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0000)
Cross-cluster signal: not computed for this run
Topic breadth penalty: reduces score when non-zero (contribution to score: -0.2000)
Under-cited
No materialized row for this family in the resolved run
This paper did not surface into the current materialized family row set.
Tabla is a pounding instrument in Hindustani classical music tradition. Tabla learning and presentation in the Indian landmass is based on stylistic schools called Gharana. Each Gharana is attributed by its main style of playing skills, act of Tabla beats, repertoire, compositions and improvisations. Recognizing the Gharana from a Tabla presentation is mainly helpful to set apparat the performance. The paper address the work of pre-programmed Gharana identified from solo Tabla recordings. I motivate the challenge and show various aspects and provocations in the task. I recognize an easy and diverse collection of over 16 hours of Tabla Sola recordings for the task. I suggest an approach using deep learning models that use an amalgam of convolutional neural networks(CNN) and long short term memory(LSTM) networks. The CNNs are used to draw out Gharana unfair features from the raw audio data. The LSTM networks are worth to classify the Gharana by using the sequence of draw out features from CNNs. Our demonstrations on Gharana recognition include different length of audio data and contrast between various aspect of the task. An expansion demonstrates a good result with highest recognition accuracy of 92% of Hindustani music as it keeps track of rhythm. It is not used only an accompaniment but also used in solo performances. Tabla solo is complex and elaborate, with a variety of pre-composed forms for uplifting further elaborations based on the player's stylistic schools called
No authors available.
Neighborhood labels
Topic labels are imported metadata and can be noisy; use them as coarse navigation hints, not authoritative classifications.
Neighbor surface
Similar papers use a separately configured neighbor embedding; it may differ from the embedding version used by the current ranked run.
No embedding-backed neighbors available for this paper/version yet.
Next handoff
01
Use Recommended to see whether this paper behaves like an emerging or undercited signal in the current ranked feed, or how it appears on the bridge preview / diagnostics view.
02
Use Trends to understand whether its attached labels are heating up or cooling down inside the curated corpus.
03
Use Evaluation to compare the dossier readout against citation and recency baselines for the same resolved family run.