Paper dossier

Objective Analysis and Perceptual Evaluation of LA-2A Compressors and Vocal Recordings

Detail viewSimilarity handoff

Review source metadata, abstract, authors, topics, and local similarity context before moving into explanation and ranking views.

Paper year

2026

Citations

0

Authors

1

Topic labels

3

Source readout

Source and corpus status

Venue

Journal of the Audio Engineering Society

Source slug

jaes

Corpus placement

Core corpus

Similarity rows

Not available yet

Ranking readout

Where this paper lands in the current run

Run shadow-generalization-product-candidate-ranking-v1Top 50 surfaced

This block uses the same resolved ranking run as Recommended. Ranks here are materialized paper_scores ranks; live Emerging may be reordered by the bounded ML scorer. Family rank is global within each family, but rank is only shown when this paper lands inside the surfaced top 50.

Families present

3

Top 50

2

Run label

shadow-generalization-product-candidate-ranking-v1

Snapshot

source-snapshot-shadow-generalization-v1-20260521

Scope: family global | run rank-83787b91ef

Emerging

Present in run, outside top 50

0.389

Emerging: embedding slice fit vs included-corpus centroid (title+abstract), plus citation velocity and topic growth; not universal relevance. Bridge signal not used here.

Signals: semantic=0.8006, citation_velocity=0.0000, topic_growth=0.7636, diversity_penalty=0.0000

Why this surfaced | 3 used | 1 penalty | 1 not computed
Embedding slice fit (corpus centroid)used

Embedding slice fit (corpus centroid): high; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.1601)

Recent attentionused

Recent attention: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0000)

Topic momentumused

Topic momentum: high; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.2291)

Cross-cluster signalnot computed

Cross-cluster signal: not computed for this run

Similarity penaltypenalty

Similarity penalty: reduces score when non-zero (contribution to score: 0.0000)

Bridge

In top 50 at rank 50

0.496

Multi-topic paper in active topics; no cluster_version on this run so bridge_score was not computed.

Signals: citation_velocity=0.0000, topic_growth=0.7636, diversity_penalty=0.0000

Why this surfaced | 2 used | 1 penalty | 2 not computed
Semantic matchnot computed

Semantic match: not computed for this run

Recent attentionused

Recent attention: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0000)

Topic momentumused

Topic momentum: high; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.4963)

Cross-cluster signalnot computed

Cross-cluster signal: not computed for this run

Topic breadth penaltypenalty

Topic breadth penalty: reduces score when non-zero (contribution to score: 0.0000)

Under-cited

In top 50 at rank 33

0.535

Low-cite candidate pool (see docs/candidate-pool-low-cite.md v0): core corpus, recency floor, citation ceiling, title+abstract gate; popularity penalty among pool members only. Semantic and bridge not yet modeled.

Signals: citation_velocity=0.0000, topic_growth=0.7636, diversity_penalty=0.0000

Why this surfaced | 2 used | 1 penalty | 2 not computed
Semantic matchnot computed

Semantic match: not computed for this run

Recent attentionused

Recent attention: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0000)

Topic momentumused

Topic momentum: high; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.5345)

Cross-cluster signalnot computed

Cross-cluster signal: not computed for this run

Pool popularity penaltypenalty

Pool popularity penalty: reduces score when non-zero (contribution to score: 0.0000)

Abstract

The LA-2A compressor is a popular optical dynamic range compressor and is much used in popular music productions, particularly as a vocal compressor. There are many claims about sonic differences between different LA-2A versions, but most of these are anecdotal with no empirical evidence to back them up. This paper explores the objective differences between six hardware LA-2A compressors, three vintage Teletronix units, and three Universal Audio reissues. Firstly, it conducts a series of measurements on six compressors, using frequency response sweeps, total harmonic distortion measurements, and tone burst to explore their attack and release characteristics. The results showed subtle differences, particularly around THD and attack and release. Subsequently, an ABX listen test was conducted with 17 trained listeners to explore the audibility of these differences. The test comprised comparing three songs where the vocal tracks had been compressed using the two most dissimilar LA-2As. The results showed a mixture of significant and nonsignificant results, suggesting that discrimination is context-dependent and difficult to discern in typical music productions.

Authors

  • Austin Moore

Neighborhood labels

Topics

3 labels

Topic labels are imported metadata and can be noisy; use them as coarse navigation hints, not authoritative classifications.

Music Technology and Sound StudiesMusic and Audio ProcessingHearing Loss and Rehabilitation

Neighbor surface

Similar papers

Similar papers use a separately configured neighbor embedding; it may differ from the embedding version used by the current ranked run.

No embedding-backed neighbors available for this paper/version yet.

Next handoff

Best next moves from here

01

Check recommendation families

Use Recommended to see whether this paper behaves like an emerging or undercited signal in the current ranked feed, or how it appears on the bridge preview / diagnostics view.

02

Inspect nearby topics

Use Trends to understand whether its attached labels are heating up or cooling down inside the curated corpus.

03

Cross-check evaluation baselines

Use Evaluation to compare the dossier readout against citation and recency baselines for the same resolved family run.