Paper dossier

3D Microphone Array Comparison Part 2: Elicitation of Salient Perceptual Attributes

Detail viewSimilarity handoff

Review source metadata, abstract, authors, topics, and local similarity context before moving into explanation and ranking views.

Paper year

2026

Citations

0

Authors

2

Topic labels

3

Source readout

Source and corpus status

Venue

Journal of the Audio Engineering Society

Source slug

jaes

Corpus placement

Core corpus

Similarity rows

Not available yet

Ranking readout

Where this paper lands in the current run

Ranking details could not be loaded (API 503).

Abstract

The growing adoption of 3D audio technologies has driven the development of a wide range of microphone array techniques; however, perceptual differences between them remain insufficiently understood and require systematic investigation. This study reports a subjective experiment comparing four 3D array configurations (OCT-3D, 2L-Cube, and PCMA-3D with 0-m and 1-m vertical spacings) using a 5.0.4 playback system. Excerpts of various musical recordings simultaneously made using the arrays were evaluated from three listening positions (center, left, back) through elicitation and audibility grading tests. Results identified perceptual differences in conventional spatial and tonal attributes but showed that their audibility varied considerably with sound source and listening position. Differences in spatial attributes such as listener envelopment and apparent source width were audible across most conditions, whereas attributes related to sound image location and stability, such as localizability, were more prominent for single sources and off-center positions. Vertical image spread was salient only for pipe organ and a five-voice a cappella ensemble. Tonal attributes such as clarity, fullness, and brightness were particularly salient off-center. These findings lay the foundation for future research on their relationship to listener preference and the development of 3D recording quality models.

Authors

  • Miki Morinaga
  • Hyunkook Lee

Neighborhood labels

Topics

3 labels

Topic labels are imported metadata and can be noisy; use them as coarse navigation hints, not authoritative classifications.

Hearing Loss and RehabilitationHuman auditory perception and evaluationMusic Technology and Sound Studies

Neighbor surface

Similar papers

Similar papers use a separately configured neighbor embedding; it may differ from the embedding version used by the current ranked run.

No embedding-backed neighbors available for this paper/version yet.

Next handoff

Best next moves from here

01

Check recommendation families

Use Recommended to see whether this paper behaves like an emerging or undercited signal in the current ranked feed, or how it appears on the bridge preview / diagnostics view.

02

Inspect nearby topics

Use Trends to understand whether its attached labels are heating up or cooling down inside the curated corpus.

03

Cross-check evaluation baselines

Use Evaluation to compare the dossier readout against citation and recency baselines for the same resolved family run.