Paper year
2026
Paper dossier
Comparative Analysis of SVM, k-NN and Logistic Regression Methods in Classifying Turkish Music Genres
Detail viewSimilarity handoff
Review source metadata, abstract, authors, topics, and local similarity context before moving into explanation and ranking views.
Citations
0
Authors
0
Topic labels
0
Source readout
Source and corpus status
Venue
Unknown venue
Source slug
unknown
Corpus placement
Controlled edge slice
Similarity rows
Not available yet
Ranking readout
Where this paper lands in the current run
Ranking details could not be loaded (API 503).
Abstract
Music genre classification represents a fundamental challenge within the field of Music Information Retrieval (MIR). The analysis of audio signals plays a pivotal role in the process of music genre classification, facilitating the extraction of pertinent information from the frequency-based data of the auditory content. In this study, diverse acoustic characteristics were derived through the utilization of the librosa library, and subsequent classification procedures were executed employing machine learning algorithms. For the purpose of this study, a dataset comprising a total of 600 music files in WAV format was meticulously curated. This dataset encompassed six distinct genres, all rooted in Turkish musical traditions. Subsequently, classification tasks were undertaken using Support Vector Machines (SVM), k-Nearest Neighbors (k-NN), and Logistic Regression algorithms. A series of experiments was conducted, varying the kernel functions and distance metrics employed. The findings of this investigation reveal the highest achieved accuracy rates, which amounted to 71.88% with k-NN, 73.44% with Logistic Regression, and 78.65% with the SVM algorithm. Notably, the SVM algorithm demonstrated superior performance in comparison to all other methodologies explored in this study.
Authors
No authors available.
Neighborhood labels
Topics
0 labels
Topic labels are imported metadata and can be noisy; use them as coarse navigation hints, not authoritative classifications.
Neighbor surface
Similar papers
Similar papers use a separately configured neighbor embedding; it may differ from the embedding version used by the current ranked run.
No embedding-backed neighbors available for this paper/version yet.
Next handoff
Best next moves from here
01
Check recommendation families
Use Recommended to see whether this paper behaves like an emerging or undercited signal in the current ranked feed, or how it appears on the bridge preview / diagnostics view.
02
Inspect nearby topics
Use Trends to understand whether its attached labels are heating up or cooling down inside the curated corpus.
03
Cross-check evaluation baselines
Use Evaluation to compare the dossier readout against citation and recency baselines for the same resolved family run.