Paper dossier

A Multidimensional MIR Analysis of Acoustic, Linguistic and Cultural Gaps Between Maskandi and Western Music Genres

Detail viewSimilarity handoff

Review source metadata, abstract, authors, topics, and local similarity context before moving into explanation and ranking views.

Paper year

2026

Citations

0

Authors

0

Topic labels

0

Paper ID: W7154260406edge sliceunknown source slug

Source readout

Source and corpus status

Venue

Unknown venue

Source slug

unknown

Corpus placement

Controlled edge slice

Similarity rows

Not available yet

Ranking readout

Where this paper lands in the current run

Ranking details could not be loaded (API 503).

Abstract

Contemporary Music Information Retrieval (MIR) and Natural Language Processing (NLP) systems are increasingly applied to diverse musical traditions, yet they are largely grounded in Western musical and linguistic assumptions. This study examines whether commonly used MIR features and multilingual NLP models adequately represent the acoustic, linguistic, and cultural structures of Maskandi music in comparison to Western music and identifies where representational gaps and biases arise. A multidimensional framework was employed, comprising acoustic and structural MIR analysis, linguistic and semantic lyrical analysis, and bias analysis. A curated dataset of 60 recordings and corresponding lyrics was analysed using rhythm and beat features, pitch contour measures, structural self-similarity, timbre embeddings, semantic similarity, lexical diversity, metaphor density, topic modelling, multilingual embeddings, and dataset-level audits. The results reveal systematic representational failures: beat tracking showed lower median IOI coefficient of variation for Maskandi (0.028) versus Western music (0.040, p = 0.0199) yet exhibited greater algorithmic instability, tempo averaged 131.16 BPM versus 111.69 BPM (p = 0.000262), pitch glide proportions were significantly higher in Maskandi (0.34 vs. 0.16), on-beat energy ratios differed substantially (2.26 vs. 1.19, p < 0.0000007), semantic similarity revealed high intra-genre coherence for Maskandi (0.73) versus Western (0.25), metaphor density approached zero in Maskandi versus up to 7 per 100 words in Western lyrics, topic modeling produced two compact clusters for Maskandi versus 6 dispersed clusters for Western, timbre embeddings achieved a 0.405 silhouette score, dataset audits revealed 0% Maskandi representation across seven major MIR corpora with African traditions comprising <3%. The study concludes that statistical separability does not imply representational adequacy and highlights the need for culturally grounded MIR and NLP representations to support diverse musical traditions.

Authors

No authors available.

Neighborhood labels

Topics

0 labels

Topic labels are imported metadata and can be noisy; use them as coarse navigation hints, not authoritative classifications.

Neighbor surface

Similar papers

Similar papers use a separately configured neighbor embedding; it may differ from the embedding version used by the current ranked run.

No embedding-backed neighbors available for this paper/version yet.

Next handoff

Best next moves from here

01

Check recommendation families

Use Recommended to see whether this paper behaves like an emerging or undercited signal in the current ranked feed, or how it appears on the bridge preview / diagnostics view.

02

Inspect nearby topics

Use Trends to understand whether its attached labels are heating up or cooling down inside the curated corpus.

03

Cross-check evaluation baselines

Use Evaluation to compare the dossier readout against citation and recency baselines for the same resolved family run.