Paper year
2026
Paper dossier
A Multi-Source Pipeline for Extracting Traditional-Style Chinese Melody Data from Symbolic Files and Score Images
Detail viewSimilarity handoff
Review source metadata, abstract, authors, topics, and local similarity context before moving into explanation and ranking views.
Citations
0
Authors
0
Topic labels
0
Source readout
Source and corpus status
Venue
Unknown venue
Source slug
unknown
Corpus placement
Controlled edge slice
Similarity rows
Not available yet
Ranking readout
Where this paper lands in the current run
Run shadow-generalization-product-candidate-ranking-v1Top 50 surfaced
This block uses the same resolved ranking run as Recommended. Ranks here are materialized paper_scores ranks; live Emerging may be reordered by the bounded ML scorer. Family rank is global within each family, but rank is only shown when this paper lands inside the surfaced top 50.
Families present
2
Top 50
0
Run label
shadow-generalization-product-candidate-ranking-v1
Snapshot
source-snapshot-shadow-generalization-v1-20260521
Scope: family global | run rank-83787b91ef
Emerging
Present in run, outside top 50
Emerging: embedding slice fit vs included-corpus centroid (title+abstract), plus citation velocity and topic growth; not universal relevance. Bridge signal not used here.
Signals: semantic=0.8424, citation_velocity=0.0000, topic_growth=0.0000, diversity_penalty=0.0000
Why this surfaced | 3 used | 1 penalty | 1 not computed
Embedding slice fit (corpus centroid)used
Embedding slice fit (corpus centroid): high; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.1685)
Recent attentionused
Recent attention: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0000)
Topic momentumused
Topic momentum: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0000)
Cross-cluster signalnot computed
Cross-cluster signal: not computed for this run
Similarity penaltypenalty
Similarity penalty: reduces score when non-zero (contribution to score: 0.0000)
Bridge
Present in run, outside top 50
Multi-topic paper in active topics; no cluster_version on this run so bridge_score was not computed.
Signals: citation_velocity=0.0000, topic_growth=0.0000, diversity_penalty=1.0000
Why this surfaced | 2 used | 1 penalty | 2 not computed
Semantic matchnot computed
Semantic match: not computed for this run
Recent attentionused
Recent attention: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0000)
Topic momentumused
Topic momentum: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0000)
Cross-cluster signalnot computed
Cross-cluster signal: not computed for this run
Topic breadth penaltypenalty
Topic breadth penalty: reduces score when non-zero (contribution to score: -0.2000)
Under-cited
No materialized row for this family in the resolved run
This paper did not surface into the current materialized family row set.
Abstract
Large-scale symbolic melody datasets are essential for data-driven music information retrieval and generation, yet traditional-style Chinese melodies remain scattered across heterogeneous score formats and image sources. Existing extraction pipelines typically focus on single modalities-either MIDI archives or standard staff notation-and lack unified handling for numbered musical notation (Jianpu) and automated quality assurance. We propose the Multi-Source Melody Pipeline (MSMP), a systems-integration prototype whose front-end admits MIDI, MusicXML, Jianpu images, and staff images, and whose back-end converges on a standardized event-level representation; the present case study exercises the image branch-in particular the Jianpu branch, through a Gemini-2.5-flash vision language model-and treats the MIDI/MusicXML ingestion paths as architectural slots that are wired in but not experimentally validated in this submission. The system employs notation-aware routing to direct score images to appropriate backends (a VLM for Jianpu and rule-based OMR for staff) and enforces a structural validity gate (schema conformance plus at least one melodic track with at least one musical event) on every candidate segment. Validation on a 292-page representative prototype cohort yielded an 80.1% structural-acceptance rate-explicitly not a transcription accuracy number-and a newly added ground-truth benchmark on 50 manually annotated Jianpu pages reports 95.8% time-signature exact accuracy, 77.1% tonal-pitch-class key accuracy, 100% tempo agreement within ±5 BPM, and, on a 10-page note-level subset, a mean first-16-note pitch F1 of 0.898 (octave-sensitive) with a Symbol Error Rate of 0.150. A companion 10-page K = 3 self-consistency audit indicates that metadata errors are systematic rather than stochastic. This work, therefore, contributes a reproducible integration architecture and a quantitative baseline on the Jianpu branch, rather than a new OMR algorithm, a new dataset release, or a fully benchmarked multi-format corpus; ongoing work addresses out-of-distribution classifier evaluation, comparison against dedicated Jianpu OMR baselines, and release of a copyright-cleared corpus.
Authors
No authors available.
Neighborhood labels
Topics
0 labels
Topic labels are imported metadata and can be noisy; use them as coarse navigation hints, not authoritative classifications.
Neighbor surface
Similar papers
Similar papers use a separately configured neighbor embedding; it may differ from the embedding version used by the current ranked run.
No embedding-backed neighbors available for this paper/version yet.
Next handoff
Best next moves from here
01
Check recommendation families
Use Recommended to see whether this paper behaves like an emerging or undercited signal in the current ranked feed, or how it appears on the bridge preview / diagnostics view.
02
Inspect nearby topics
Use Trends to understand whether its attached labels are heating up or cooling down inside the curated corpus.
03
Cross-check evaluation baselines
Use Evaluation to compare the dossier readout against citation and recency baselines for the same resolved family run.