Paper dossier

JSD: A Dataset for Structure Analysis in Jazz Music

Detail viewSimilarity handoff

Review source metadata, abstract, authors, topics, and local similarity context before moving into explanation and ranking views.

Paper year

2022

Citations

11

Authors

5

Topic labels

3

Source readout

Source and corpus status

Venue

Transactions of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval

Source slug

tismir

Corpus placement

Core corpus

Similarity rows

6

Ranking readout

Where this paper lands in the current run

Ranking details could not be loaded (API 503).

Abstract

Given a music recording, music structure analysis aims at identifying important structural elements and segmenting the recording according to these elements. In jazz music, a performance is often structured by repeating harmonic schemata (known as choruses), which lay the foundation for improvisation by soloists. Within the fields of music information retrieval (MIR) and computational musicology, the Weimar Jazz Database (WJD) has turned out to be an extremely valuable resource for jazz research. Containing high-quality solo transcriptions for 456 solo sections, the dataset opened up new avenues for the understanding of creative processes in jazz improvisation using computational methods. In this paper, we complement this dataset by introducing the Jazz Structure Dataset (JSD), which provides annotations on structure and instrumentation of entire recordings. The JSD comprises 340 recordings with more than 3000 annotated segments, along with a segment-wise encoding of the solo and accompanying instruments. These annotations provide the basis for training, testing, and evaluating models for various important MIR tasks, including structure analysis, solo detection, or instrument recognition. As an example application, we consider the task of structure boundary detection. Based on a traditional novelty-based as well as a more recent data-driven approach using deep learning, we indicate the potential of the JSD while critically reflecting on some evaluation aspects of structure analysis. In this context, we also demonstrate how the JSD annotations and analysis results can be made accessible in a user-friendly way via web-based interfaces for data inspection and visualization. All annotations, experimental results, and code for reproducibility are made publicly available for research purposes.

Authors

  • Stefan Balke
  • Julian Reck
  • Ch. Weiß
  • Jakob Abeßer
  • Meinard Müller

Neighborhood labels

Topics

3 labels

Topic labels are imported metadata and can be noisy; use them as coarse navigation hints, not authoritative classifications.

Music and Audio ProcessingMusic Technology and Sound StudiesNeuroscience and Music Perception

Neighbor surface

Similar papers

6 total neighborsEmbedding v1-title-abstract-1536-cleantext-r3

Similar papers use a separately configured neighbor embedding; it may differ from the embedding version used by the current ranked run.

Next handoff

Best next moves from here

01

Check recommendation families

Use Recommended to see whether this paper behaves like an emerging or undercited signal in the current ranked feed, or how it appears on the bridge preview / diagnostics view.

02

Inspect nearby topics

Use Trends to understand whether its attached labels are heating up or cooling down inside the curated corpus.

03

Cross-check evaluation baselines

Use Evaluation to compare the dossier readout against citation and recency baselines for the same resolved family run.