Paper dossier

Re(de)fining Sonification: Project Classification Strategies in the Data Sonification Archive

Detail viewSimilarity handoff

Review source metadata, abstract, authors, topics, and local similarity context before moving into explanation and ranking views.

Paper year

2024

Citations

2

Authors

5

Topic labels

3

Source readout

Source and corpus status

Venue

Journal of the Audio Engineering Society

Source slug

jaes

Corpus placement

Core corpus

Similarity rows

6

Ranking readout

Where this paper lands in the current run

Run shadow-generalization-product-candidate-ranking-v1Top 50 surfaced

This block uses the same resolved ranking run as Recommended. Ranks here are materialized paper_scores ranks; live Emerging may be reordered by the bounded ML scorer. Family rank is global within each family, but rank is only shown when this paper lands inside the surfaced top 50.

Families present

3

Top 50

0

Run label

shadow-generalization-product-candidate-ranking-v1

Snapshot

source-snapshot-shadow-generalization-v1-20260521

Scope: family global | run rank-83787b91ef

Emerging

Present in run, outside top 50

0.268

Emerging: embedding slice fit vs included-corpus centroid (title+abstract), plus citation velocity and topic growth; not universal relevance. Bridge signal not used here.

Signals: semantic=0.8377, citation_velocity=0.0800, topic_growth=0.2000, diversity_penalty=0.0000

Why this surfaced | 3 used | 1 penalty | 1 not computed
Embedding slice fit (corpus centroid)used

Embedding slice fit (corpus centroid): high; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.1675)

Recent attentionused

Recent attention: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0400)

Topic momentumused

Topic momentum: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0600)

Cross-cluster signalnot computed

Cross-cluster signal: not computed for this run

Similarity penaltypenalty

Similarity penalty: reduces score when non-zero (contribution to score: 0.0000)

Bridge

Present in run, outside top 50

0.158

Multi-topic paper in active topics; no cluster_version on this run so bridge_score was not computed.

Signals: citation_velocity=0.0800, topic_growth=0.2000, diversity_penalty=0.0000

Why this surfaced | 2 used | 1 penalty | 2 not computed
Semantic matchnot computed

Semantic match: not computed for this run

Recent attentionused

Recent attention: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0280)

Topic momentumused

Topic momentum: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.1300)

Cross-cluster signalnot computed

Cross-cluster signal: not computed for this run

Topic breadth penaltypenalty

Topic breadth penalty: reduces score when non-zero (contribution to score: 0.0000)

Under-cited

Present in run, outside top 50

0.053

Low-cite candidate pool (see docs/candidate-pool-low-cite.md v0): core corpus, recency floor, citation ceiling, title+abstract gate; popularity penalty among pool members only. Semantic and bridge not yet modeled.

Signals: citation_velocity=0.0800, topic_growth=0.2000, diversity_penalty=0.4421

Why this surfaced | 2 used | 1 penalty | 2 not computed
Semantic matchnot computed

Semantic match: not computed for this run

Recent attentionused

Recent attention: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.0240)

Topic momentumused

Topic momentum: low; used in final ranking (contribution to score: 0.1400)

Cross-cluster signalnot computed

Cross-cluster signal: not computed for this run

Pool popularity penaltypenalty

Pool popularity penalty: reduces score when non-zero (contribution to score: -0.1105)

Abstract

This study focuses on a corpus of 445 sonification projects currently available in the Data Sonification Archive (DSA). The DSA develops in a collaborative process that involves researchers and creative communities, and has been online since early 2021. Projects are heuristically classified according to several aspects, in particular their intended purpose, targeted users, subject matter, sonification method, and combination of media. In the present study, we analyse six curatorial classification strategies, labelled <i>Goal</i>, <i>Method</i>, <i>User,</i> <i>Macro Topic</i>, <i>Micro Topic</i>, and <i>MediaMix</i>, and discuss their definitions and usefulness for the archive. We then introduce two computational classification strategies, respectively based on clustering of music information retrieval of sonification audio, and topic modelling of the descriptive texts that accompany DSA projects. Correlation analysis between curatorial and computational classifications, correspondingly sized, showed that the text-based method was more powerful than the audio-based methods. We then explored predictive modelling, tentatively achieving results for <i>Goal, Method, and Macro Topic</i>. This points towards the potential for automatic classification to assist in the curatorial management of the archive, as well as for similar repositories. The discussion focuses on how analysis of classification strategies supports a broadening of the definition of sonification, both as theoretical construct and as practice, where the communicative intention of the author, the aesthetic quality of the listening experience, a more explicit focus on narrative patterns, and other emerging aspects within sonification design, are all contributing factors to transitioning the field towards a mass medium for data representation, communication, and meaning-making.

Authors

  • PerMagnus Lindborg
  • Valentina Caiola
  • Manni Chen
  • Paolo Ciuccarelli
  • Sara Lenzi

Neighborhood labels

Topics

3 labels

Topic labels are imported metadata and can be noisy; use them as coarse navigation hints, not authoritative classifications.

BIM and Construction IntegrationDesign Education and PracticeTactile and Sensory Interactions

Neighbor surface

Similar papers

6 total neighborsEmbedding v1-title-abstract-1536-cleantext-r3

Similar papers use a separately configured neighbor embedding; it may differ from the embedding version used by the current ranked run.

Next handoff

Best next moves from here

01

Check recommendation families

Use Recommended to see whether this paper behaves like an emerging or undercited signal in the current ranked feed, or how it appears on the bridge preview / diagnostics view.

02

Inspect nearby topics

Use Trends to understand whether its attached labels are heating up or cooling down inside the curated corpus.

03

Cross-check evaluation baselines

Use Evaluation to compare the dossier readout against citation and recency baselines for the same resolved family run.